After RFC-0125 implementation, Determinate Systems was pinged multiple
times to transfer the repository ownership of the tooling to a
vendor-neutral repository.
Unfortunately, this never manifested. Additionally, the leadership of
the NixOS project was too dysfunctional to deal with this sort of
problem. It might even still be the case up to this day.
Nonetheless, nixpkgs is about enabling end users to enact their own
policies. It would be better to live in a world where there is one
obvious choice of bootspec tooling, in the meantime, we can live in a
world where people can choose their bootspec tooling.
The Lix forge possess one fork of the Bootspec tooling:
https://git.lix.systems/lix-community/bootspec which will live its own
life from now on.
Change-Id: I00c4dd64e00b4c24f6641472902e7df60ed13b55
Signed-off-by: Raito Bezarius <masterancpp@gmail.com>
An installer tests exacerbates the distribution packaging but in the
case of NixOS: the Nix package manager implementation.
As part of our classical release management process, the Lix team tests
whether a NixOS system installs just fine with Lix or not.
To avoid bloating the CI needlessly and keeping it simple, we only
introduce it on the simple variant and give a general way to pipe a Nix
implementation inside of an installer test.
Change-Id: I781da14475867dc2d946b740bad10af5de79ec5a
Signed-off-by: Raito Bezarius <masterancpp@gmail.com>
After final improvements to the official formatter implementation,
this commit now performs the first treewide reformat of Nix files using it.
This is part of the implementation of RFC 166.
Only "inactive" files are reformatted, meaning only files that
aren't being touched by any PR with activity in the past 2 months.
This is to avoid conflicts for PRs that might soon be merged.
Later we can do a full treewide reformat to get the rest,
which should not cause as many conflicts.
A CI check has already been running for some time to ensure that new and
already-formatted files are formatted, so the files being reformatted here
should also stay formatted.
This commit was automatically created and can be verified using
nix-build a08b3a4d19.tar.gz \
--argstr baseRev b32a094368
result/bin/apply-formatting $NIXPKGS_PATH
- use normal VM nodes for target, with some extra trickery
- rename preBootCommands to postBootCommands to match its actual intent
- rename VMs to installer and target, so they're not all called machine
- set platforms on non-UEFI tests properly
- add missing packages for systemd-boot test
- fix initrd secrets leaking into the store and having wrong paths
this lets us *dis*able filesystem explicitly, as is required by e.g. the
zfs-less installer images. currently that specifically is only easily
possible by adding an overlay that stubs out `zfs`, with the obvious
side-effect of also removing tooling that could run without the kernel
module loaded.
Building a python environment with python3Minimal requires hydra
to bootstrap pip and build all packages used in the environment
which would otherwise not be built. This reduces cache re-use and duplicates things.
Also common dependencies normally included in python itself
are not properly checked and can cause hard to debug errors
because everyone just assumes those modules are there.
Let's test / on ZFS and /boot on ZFS in separate tests since the GRUB integration for ZFS seems to be not very well maintained.
If the test breaks in the future it's easier to figure out that ZFS on /boot is at fault and either fix the issue or disable the test.
The new test creates a ZFS pool where all features not compatible with GRUB2 are disabled. The dataset is then mounted on /boot and we check that the installer correctly generates a bootable configuration.
Try to use as many ZFS features as possible to verify that GRUB can handle them.
