Format all Nix files using the officially approved formatter,
making the CI check introduced in the previous commit succeed:
nix-build ci -A fmt.check
This is the next step of the of the [implementation](https://github.com/NixOS/nixfmt/issues/153)
of the accepted [RFC 166](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/166).
This commit will lead to merge conflicts for a number of PRs,
up to an estimated ~1100 (~33%) among the PRs with activity in the past 2
months, but that should be lower than what it would be without the previous
[partial treewide format](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/322537).
Merge conflicts caused by this commit can now automatically be resolved while rebasing using the
[auto-rebase script](8616af08d9/maintainers/scripts/auto-rebase).
If you run into any problems regarding any of this, please reach out to the
[formatting team](https://nixos.org/community/teams/formatting/) by
pinging @NixOS/nix-formatting.
`lib.all (_: false) [ ]` is `true`, which is not the semantics we want
here, and interacts poorly with `boot.zfs.extraPools` where
`getPoolFilesystems` may return `[]`. So explicitly handle this case.
This does mean there isn’t a straightforward way to disable auto-import
with `extraPools` and no associated `fileSystems` while keeping the unit
around, but that’s probably okay for now.
See https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/364995.
Broken in 7f8278a264.
This requires all datasets for the pool specified in `fileSystems` to be
marked noauto.
Note that this implicitly skips some tasks for the pool, such as
`expandOnBoot`, as the pool will not be imported at that time.
`pkgs.zfs_unstable` is pre-release software and may very well have
critical bugs that make it unsuitable for general use. As such, we
should not recommend it as a general solution to the problem of "my
Kernel is too new for stable ZFS".
The fully-qualified name would certainly be a lot here, but `with` can
still be unclear even with narrow scope. A short `let` adds clarity
without significantly increasing verbosity.
This was incorrectly getting `lib.version` which is e.g.
`"24.11pre-git"`, but should have been the ZFS package version. However,
the condition, at least per the comment, is reversed and should be
instead `versionOlder cfgZfs.package.version "2.2.0"`. However, the
entire premise seems to be incorrect, as ZFS 2.2.6 includes the spl
module. Since the previous condition here was effectively always true,
it would initially seem the best move is to remove the conditional
altogether and always include the spl kmod. However, going back to
4360a87c45 where this condition was added,
the intent appears to be that spl was no longer needed here in
the-pre-release ZFS (long since in all supported versions), due to it
being merged into ZFS mainline. Given that intent and that our boot
tests on all versions succeed without including it in the initrd, remove
it.
these changes were generated with nixq 0.0.2, by running
nixq ">> lib.mdDoc[remove] Argument[keep]" --batchmode nixos/**.nix
nixq ">> mdDoc[remove] Argument[keep]" --batchmode nixos/**.nix
nixq ">> Inherit >> mdDoc[remove]" --batchmode nixos/**.nix
two mentions of the mdDoc function remain in nixos/, both of which
are inside of comments.
Since lib.mdDoc is already defined as just id, this commit is a no-op as
far as Nix (and the built manual) is concerned.
This just adds complexity and confusion. Once-upon-a-time, there was no
`package` and only `enableUnstable`, but now it is just confusing to
have both, as it would be possible to do e.g. `package = pkgs.zfs` and
`enableUnstable = true`, but then `enableUnstable` does nothing.
This adds compatibility with newer kernels, which fixes
nixosTests.zfs.series_2_1, which broke when the default kernel version
was bumped.
This means we no longer need the removeLinuxDRM option at all, but
I've kept it around as a no-op so people can leave it set in case the
same thing happens again in future.
ZFS no longer tries to use GPL-only symbols on aarch64.
Tested by building nixosTests.zfs.stable (modified to use Linux 6.6)
and nixosTests.zfs.unstable.
this lets us *dis*able filesystem explicitly, as is required by e.g. the
zfs-less installer images. currently that specifically is only easily
possible by adding an overlay that stubs out `zfs`, with the obvious
side-effect of also removing tooling that could run without the kernel
module loaded.
Encountered boot errors in pool with `listsnapshots=on` getKeyLocations should ignore snapshots as they will not be well-handled by createImportService later on
When `config.boot.zfs.enableUnstable` is set to true, grub was built with the `zfs` package even though the rest of the system uses the `zfsUnstable` package.
The effect of this can only be seen when `zfs` and `zfsUnstable` actually differ (which is not currently the case), for example when overriding one of them locally.
This simplifies the setup to receive emails from the ZFS Event Daemon
by relying on the sendmail wrapper defined by other modules such as
msmtp or Postfix.
This is more similar to how other modules like smartd deal with email
configuration.
The user is no longer required to define and rebuild their own ZFS
package to add email support.
GitHub: closes https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/132464
This re-introduces the old stable ZFS version we had in the past following
the many predicted issues of ZFS 2.2.x series, that is much more stable
than any further ZFS version at the moment.
I am also removing myself from maintenance of any further ZFS versions as I am
planning to quit ZFS maintenance at some point.
In the meantime, for users like me who depend on ZFS for critical operations, here is a ZFS version
that is known to work for LTS kernels.
Being wanted by and ordered before local-fs.target isn't strictly
correct. And in systemd initrd, it's very incorrect because
local-fs.target is for the initrd file system, not the real root file
system.
