zowoq
90a94678de
ci/eval: restore 501+ label
...
(cherry picked from commit b94f270650
2025-01-24 15:06:01 +00:00
Peder Bergebakken Sundt
29623dc5c2
ci/eval: support "10.rebuild-${kernel}: 1" labels
...
This should restore the old behavior of ofborg
(cherry picked from commit a226f13211
2025-01-20 13:38:51 +00:00
Silvan Mosberger
0916ec48fb
workflows/eval: Use maintainer GitHub IDs for review requests of changed packages
...
The handles can change over time and there's nothing guaranteeing the
ones in the maintainer list are up-to-date. In comparison GitHub IDs
never change.
(cherry picked from commit b844cba4e6
2025-01-03 20:30:51 +00:00
Silvan Mosberger
db45da12a8
workflows/eval: Request reviews from changed package maintainers
...
Currently we need to rely on ofborg requesting reviews from package
maintainers, which takes a while with ofborg's eval queue. Since
recently we're doing faster evaluations with GitHub Actions, which contain all
necessary information to determine reviewers of changed packages the
same way ofborg does. This PR takes advantage of that.
(cherry picked from commit b9d800d468
2025-01-03 20:30:51 +00:00
Janne Heß
db5a0ad774
ci: Label 10.rebuild-*-stdenv ( #369102 )
...
Currently ofborg does this, but there is actually no real reason this
shouldn't be done by CI
(cherry picked from commit 6d96c9a21e
2025-01-01 04:35:47 -05:00
Jörg Thalheim
bb3bf66877
ci/eval/compare: truncate step summary to 1024k
...
(cherry picked from commit 44dc31e676
2025-01-01 04:35:46 -05:00
Silvan Mosberger
7f0d2b1b45
ci/eval: Avoid noise for failing attribute evals
...
It's currently annoying to see the actual failure in the attrs step,
because `time -v` displays like 20 lines, which get repeated, therefore
requiring you to scroll up most of the time:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/actions/runs/12290298121/job/34297218345#step:5:794
This commit fixes that by only displaying the most important stats, the
same ones as the chunked system-specific evals.
(cherry picked from commit bd5c93ca3d
2025-01-01 04:35:45 -05:00
Gaetan Lepage
c1553b513e
ci/eval: allow precisely choosing which systems to evaluate for (evalSystem -> evalSystems)
...
(cherry picked from commit 6eadbf9c97
2025-01-01 04:35:45 -05:00
Gaetan Lepage
e88b48d259
ci/eval: add rebuildsByPlatform to the comparison result
...
(cherry picked from commit 518ae8fd58
2025-01-01 04:35:44 -05:00
Gaetan Lepage
ff9bb621de
ci/eval: fix compare label assignment
...
(cherry picked from commit 214cb79aa6
2025-01-01 04:35:44 -05:00
Gaetan Lepage
3f4f84fdc7
ci/eval: re-implement compare in nix
...
(cherry picked from commit f94b4bd945
2025-01-01 04:35:44 -05:00
Jörg Thalheim
0952756344
[release-24.11] GitHub Action eval backports ( #361168 )
2024-12-03 07:29:28 +01:00
Silvan Mosberger
d7ba9d09cb
ci/eval: Also count added packages as rebuilds
...
This is also what ofborg does
(cherry picked from commit 449314825e
2024-12-02 20:59:06 +00:00
Jörg Thalheim
7ea19651d6
github/workflows/eval: add nixos package search links and wrap sections in a summary list
...
(cherry picked from commit 006691de3c
2024-12-02 19:06:24 +01:00
Jörg Thalheim
bd1bcde2ec
github/workflows/eval: limit number of packages in markdown
...
(cherry picked from commit 8b7ed6e105
2024-12-02 19:06:19 +01:00
Noa Aarts
432bc2ceac
github/workflows/eval: add markdown of added, removed and changed
...
(cherry picked from commit 0e27bc3f9e
2024-12-02 19:06:14 +01:00
Jörg Thalheim
e4e9f713cb
ci/eval: don't allow IFD
...
(cherry picked from commit 5978e7fa2f
2024-12-02 19:05:48 +01:00
Jörg Thalheim
8ea3a59601
ci: use nix 2.24
...
(cherry picked from commit d65d18f1e4
2024-12-02 19:05:42 +01:00
Wolfgang Walther
8265d51a3c
ci: fix GHA's rebuild-xxx: 5001+ labels
...
(cherry picked from commit a06822cabf
2024-12-01 19:44:00 +00:00
Silvan Mosberger
8b4d5bc0bb
workflows/eval.yml: Run on dev branch pushes and apply rebuild labels
...
(cherry picked from commit af1aa40e73
2024-11-29 23:33:43 +00:00
Silvan Mosberger
cb77c97eb2
Parallel GH actions workflow for Nixpkgs eval
...
Motivated by ofborg struggling [1] and its evaluations taking too long,
inspired by Jörg's initial PR [2]
and Adam's previous attempt to parallelise Nixpkgs evaluation [3],
this PR contains initial work to relief ofborg from its evaluation duty
by using GitHub Actions to evaluate Nixpkgs.
For now this doesn't take care of all of what ofborg does, such as
requesting appropriate reviewers or labeling mass rebuilds, but this can
be follow-up work.
[1]: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/infrastructure-announcement-the-future-of-ofborg-your-help-needed/56025?u=infinisil
[2]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/352808
[3]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/269403
Co-Authored-By: Jörg Thalheim <joerg@thalheim.io>
Co-Authored-By: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
(cherry picked from commit fbbe972898
2024-11-20 20:24:27 +00:00
