![]() Given that we were overriding qemu_test to enable this anyway, enabling this by default saves Hydra a QEMU build. There's also clear demand from users[1] for this feature, so our alternatives are: - Offer a qemu-canokey attribute. I don't want to do this, because I don't think there's any reason to make Hydra build an extra QEMU. - Enable it only for qemu_test. I don't want to do this, because it will lead to users using qemu_test without understanding its subtleties. - Force users to build from source. I don't think there's any reason to do this when it's unlikely to hurt anybody having it enabled by default. There's no reason to single out canokey to be disabled by default in spite of users' needs given that we enable so many other optional QEMU features. [1]: https://github.com/canokeys/canokey-qemu/issues/6 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
doc/manual | ||
lib | ||
maintainers | ||
modules | ||
tests | ||
COPYING | ||
default.nix | ||
README.md | ||
release-combined.nix | ||
release-small.nix | ||
release.nix |
NixOS
NixOS is a Linux distribution based on the purely functional package management system Nix. More information can be found at https://nixos.org/nixos and in the manual in doc/manual.
Testing changes
You can add new module to your NixOS configuration file (usually it’s /etc/nixos/configuration.nix
). And do sudo nixos-rebuild test -I nixpkgs=<path to your local nixpkgs folder> --fast
.
Commit conventions
-
Make sure you read about the commit conventions common to Nixpkgs as a whole.
-
Format the commit messages in the following way:
nixos/(module): (init module | add setting | refactor | etc) (Motivation for change. Link to release notes. Additional information.)
Examples:
-
nixos/hydra: add bazBaz option
Dual baz behavior is needed to do foo.
-
nixos/nginx: refactor config generation
The old config generation system used impure shell scripts and could break in specific circumstances (see #1234).
-
Reviewing contributions
When changing the bootloader installation process, extra care must be taken. Grub installations cannot be rolled back, hence changes may break people’s installations forever. For any non-trivial change to the bootloader please file a PR asking for review, especially from @edolstra.
Module updates
Module updates are submissions changing modules in some ways. These often contains changes to the options or introduce new options.
Reviewing process:
- Ensure that the module maintainers are notified.
- CODEOWNERS will make GitHub notify users based on the submitted changes, but it can happen that it misses some of the package maintainers.
- Ensure that the module tests, if any, are succeeding.
- You may invoke OfBorg with
@ofborg test <module>
to buildnixosTests.<module>
- You may invoke OfBorg with
- Ensure that the introduced options are correct.
- Type should be appropriate (string related types differs in their merging capabilities,
loaOf
andstring
types are deprecated). - Description, default and example should be provided.
- Type should be appropriate (string related types differs in their merging capabilities,
- Ensure that option changes are backward compatible.
mkRenamedOptionModuleWith
provides a way to make renamed option backward compatible.- Use
lib.versionAtLeast config.system.stateVersion "23.11"
on backward incompatible changes which may corrupt, change or update the state stored on existing setups.
- Ensure that removed options are declared with
mkRemovedOptionModule
. - Ensure that changes that are not backward compatible are mentioned in release notes.
- Ensure that documentations affected by the change is updated.
Sample template for a module update review is provided below.
##### Reviewed points
- [ ] changes are backward compatible
- [ ] removed options are declared with `mkRemovedOptionModule`
- [ ] changes that are not backward compatible are documented in release notes
- [ ] module tests succeed on ARCHITECTURE
- [ ] options types are appropriate
- [ ] options description is set
- [ ] options example is provided
- [ ] documentation affected by the changes is updated
##### Possible improvements
##### Comments
New modules
New modules submissions introduce a new module to NixOS.
Reviewing process:
- Ensure that all file paths fit the guidelines.
- Ensure that the module tests, if any, are succeeding.
- Ensure that the introduced options are correct.
- Type should be appropriate (string related types differs in their merging capabilities,
loaOf
andstring
types are deprecated). - Description, default and example should be provided.
- Type should be appropriate (string related types differs in their merging capabilities,
- Ensure that module
meta
field is present- Maintainers should be declared in
meta.maintainers
. - Module documentation should be declared with
meta.doc
.
- Maintainers should be declared in
- Ensure that the module respect other modules functionality.
- For example, enabling a module should not open firewall ports by default.
Sample template for a new module review is provided below.
##### Reviewed points
- [ ] module path fits the guidelines
- [ ] module tests succeed on ARCHITECTURE
- [ ] options have appropriate types
- [ ] options have default
- [ ] options have example
- [ ] options have descriptions
- [ ] No unneeded package is added to `environment.systemPackages`
- [ ] `meta.maintainers` is set
- [ ] module documentation is declared in `meta.doc`
##### Possible improvements
##### Comments