nixpkgs/ci
Wolfgang Walther 515b174c42
workflows/check-cherry-picks: post review comments
Instead of failing the job, the workflow will now post review comments
as "Request Changes". This makes the feedback more readily visible and
avoids having to merge despite a failing CI job. It is also a
pre-requisite to enable required status checks / required workflows in
the future.

Committers are asked to confirm the differences by explicitly dismissing
the generated review. After dismissal, the related review comment will
automatically be marked as "resolved".

The comments only report warnings and errors. Reviews are automatically
dismissed when they have been addressed by the author and no problems
remain. If problems remain, existing, still pending, review comments
will be updated. If the same problems had already been dismissed
earlier, no new review comment will be created either.
2025-06-01 09:35:47 +02:00
..
codeowners-validator ci: Add codeowners validator 2024-10-08 22:14:59 +02:00
eval ci/eval: don't evaluate packages marked as broken (#409867) 2025-05-28 13:36:19 +00:00
nixpkgs-vet nixpkgs-vet: update CI, docs, and release to 0.1.4 2024-09-03 13:53:25 -07:00
request-reviews ci/request-reviews: Don't fail when there's too many reviewers 2025-01-20 19:45:28 +01:00
check-cherry-picks.md workflows/check-cherry-picks: post review comments 2025-06-01 09:35:47 +02:00
check-cherry-picks.sh workflows/check-cherry-picks: post review comments 2025-06-01 09:35:47 +02:00
default.nix workflows/manual-nixpkgs: build nixpkgs manual on staging and stable branches 2025-05-29 17:06:40 +02:00
nixpkgs-vet.nix workflows/nixpkgs-vet: use nixpkgs-vet from pinned nixpkgs 2025-05-25 15:01:42 +02:00
nixpkgs-vet.sh workflows/nixpkgs-vet: use nixpkgs-vet from pinned nixpkgs 2025-05-25 15:01:42 +02:00
OWNERS OWNERS: add owners for authelia files 2025-05-28 21:49:14 +02:00
parse.nix ci/parse: init 2025-05-11 12:14:57 +02:00
pinned-nixpkgs.json ci: Update pinned Nixpkgs 2025-05-29 16:27:56 +02:00
README.md workflows/get-merge-commit: inline get-merge-commit.sh script as github-script 2025-05-23 23:05:26 +02:00
supportedSystems.json workflows/eval: load supportedSystems from JSON file 2025-05-11 22:22:45 +02:00
update-pinned-nixpkgs.sh ci/update-pinned-nixpkgs.sh: Allow setting the rev 2024-07-18 15:51:02 +02:00

CI support files

This directory contains files to support CI, such as GitHub Actions and Ofborg. This is in contrast with maintainers/scripts which is for human use instead.

Pinned Nixpkgs

CI may need certain packages from Nixpkgs. In order to ensure that the needed packages are generally available without building, pinned-nixpkgs.json contains a pinned Nixpkgs version tested by Hydra.

Run update-pinned-nixpkgs.sh to update it.

ci/nixpkgs-vet.sh BASE_BRANCH [REPOSITORY]

Runs the nixpkgs-vet tool on the HEAD commit, closely matching what CI does. This can't do exactly the same as CI, because CI needs to rely on GitHub's server-side Git history to compute the mergeability of PRs before the check can be started. In turn, when contributors are running this tool locally, we don't want to have to push commits to test them, and we can also rely on the local Git history to do the mergeability check.

Arguments:

  • BASE_BRANCH: The base branch to use, e.g. master or release-24.05
  • REPOSITORY: The repository from which to fetch the base branch. Defaults to https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs.git.

ci/nixpkgs-vet

This directory contains scripts and files used and related to nixpkgs-vet, which the CI uses to implement pkgs/by-name checks, along with many other Nixpkgs architecture rules. See also the CI GitHub Action.

ci/nixpkgs-vet/update-pinned-tool.sh

Updates the pinned nixpkgs-vet tool in ci/nixpkgs-vet/pinned-version.txt to the latest release.

Each release contains a pre-built x86_64-linux version of the tool which is used by CI.

This script currently needs to be called manually when the CI tooling needs to be updated.

Why not just build the tooling right from the PRs Nixpkgs version?

  • Because it allows CI to check all PRs, even if they would break the CI tooling.
  • Because it makes the CI check very fast, since no Nix builds need to be done, even for mass rebuilds.
  • Because it improves security, since we don't have to build potentially untrusted code from PRs. The tool only needs a very minimal Nix evaluation at runtime, which can work with readonly-mode and restrict-eval.