04 05 S-Wave fix

src/04_s_wave_of_stability.md

@@ -34,11 +34,11 @@ However, in order to compare objects with each other, often one dimensional para
 
 On the one hand \- very precise determination of coordinates on the S-axis and creation of a MODEL PERIODIC grid, ***in the nodes of which important properties of matter change, the most widespread systems are located, etc***. On the other hand \- ***non-metric intuitive division of objects by their properties***.
 
-Let us return to our wave model (see Fig. 1.7). The construction of the S \- WAVE of stability (SWS) was a very long, painstaking process, which can be compared to the reconstruction of the appearance of an unknown ancient animal based on several fragments of its skeleton. And only the complexity of the comparison of facts, their multifactor check for consistency allowed us to confidently assert that the S \- WAVE of stability is not a figment of imagination, but ONE OF THE PHYSICAL REALITIES OF OUR WORLD. In further sections of the book this will be shown with all possible completeness.
+Let us return to our wave model (see Fig. 1.7). The construction of the S-WAVE of stability (SWS) was a very long, painstaking process, which can be compared to the reconstruction of the appearance of an unknown ancient animal based on several fragments of its skeleton. And only the complexity of the comparison of facts, their multifactor check for consistency allowed us to confidently assert that the S-WAVE of stability is not a figment of imagination, but ONE OF THE PHYSICAL REALITIES OF OUR WORLD. In further sections of the book this will be shown with all possible completeness.
 
-The S \- WAVE of stability (SWS) makes it possible to place nuclear and structural forms of matter on different scale levels. It allows us to give a qualitative comparison of their relative stability. In addition, the points of intersection of the SWS with the S-axis, as revealed by the analysis, are ***dimensional boundaries*** for the main classes of the systems we have chosen.
+The S-WAVE of stability (SWS) makes it possible to place nuclear and structural forms of matter on different scale levels. It allows us to give a qualitative comparison of their relative stability. In addition, the points of intersection of the SWS with the S-axis, as revealed by the analysis, are ***dimensional boundaries*** for the main classes of the systems we have chosen.
 
-The S \- WAVE of stability  has a number of other additional informational properties, which, as will be shown below, lead us to the regularities of large-scale dynamics in the Universe. It should be said that many successful properties of the wave model make it simply an ***indispensable tool for preliminary analysis of large-scale regularities in the Universe.***
+The S-WAVE of stability  has a number of other additional informational properties, which, as will be shown below, lead us to the regularities of large-scale dynamics in the Universe. It should be said that many successful properties of the wave model make it simply an ***indispensable tool for preliminary analysis of large-scale regularities in the Universe.***
 
 That said, it should be noted that it does have some very unprocessed areas.
 
@@ -46,4 +46,4 @@ First, it is the interval from \-33 to \-13, the so-called Dirac basement. By pl
 
 Secondly, in fact the nodal sizes \-3, \+2 to and \+7 are very weakly supported by statistical basis from physics. Yes, \-3 is the most important size for the biosphere, the average size of cells, yes \+2 is the most important size for humans \- their own growth. But how do you compare a cell to a human being and the rest of the physical world? This is partly answered in the book "Man on the scale of the Universe," but questions remain.
 
-Thirdly, astrophysicists do not know the true size of stellar nuclei. Their theoretical size of \+7...+8 orders of magnitude on the S-axis does not agree with astrophysical calculations, which give orders of magnitude larger sizes. Thus, we do not know what the true ratio between the average size of a star and its nucleus is. Is it the same as that of an atom, i.e., 1 to \\(10^{5}\\), or is it significantly different, e.g., 1 to 100? Thus, there are many questions about the structure of the S \- WAVE of stability . But, on the other hand, there is not a single observational fact that violates it. There are unclear, unexplored places, but there are still no contradictions with the factual material.
+Thirdly, astrophysicists do not know the true size of stellar nuclei. Their theoretical size of \+7...+8 orders of magnitude on the S-axis does not agree with astrophysical calculations, which give orders of magnitude larger sizes. Thus, we do not know what the true ratio between the average size of a star and its nucleus is. Is it the same as that of an atom, i.e., 1 to \\(10^{5}\\), or is it significantly different, e.g., 1 to 100? Thus, there are many questions about the structure of the S-WAVE of stability . But, on the other hand, there is not a single observational fact that violates it. There are unclear, unexplored places, but there are still no contradictions with the factual material.

src/05_s_classification_boundaries_in_the_s_structure_of_the_universe.md

@@ -1,9 +1,7 @@
 # S-classification boundaries in the S-structure of the universe
 
-##                                  **CLASSIFICATION BOUNDARIES IN THE S-STRUCTURE OF THE UNIVERSE**
-
 In the previous chapters it was shown that the ***most typical*** representatives of the thirteen main classes of objects of the Universe are located on the S-axis with strict periodicity in five and ten  orders of magnitude. In doing so, we used the *geometric mean* sizes of the selected objects. Recall that this parameter was defined as the midpoint of the scale range of the objects' existence. For this purpose, the dimensional boundaries for each studied class (minimum and maximum) were marked on the S-axis, and then the midpoint of the obtained segment was found.
 
-The logical development of this scheme led the author to the construction of the S \- WAVE of stability . Then it unexpectedly turned out that the SWS MODEL has additional heuristic possibilities. For example, in many cases the ***permissible range of object sizes coincides with the points of intersection of SWS and S-axis, and the scaling length of this range in many cases is equal to five  orders of magnitude***. That is, not only the main objects of thirteen classes of the Universe are located at a distance of five orders of magnitude from each other, but the scaling range of eleven of them is also almost always equal to five orders of magnitude. At the same time, each upper half-wave of the SWS, having a scaling length of five  orders, as we have already said, is "populated" mainly by ***structural*** objects, and each lower half-wave \- by ***nuclear*** objects. Moreover, it turned out that the upper and lower inflection points of the SWS are also classification boundaries, but within each of the thirteen classes. Since the special points on the SWS (inflection points and points of intersection with the S-axis) alternate in 2.5 orders, ***this model gives us a hierarchical scale classification***. In this classification, there are large cells whose scaling length is twenty orders of magnitude. These large cells are subdivided into cells of ten orders of magnitude, which in turn are subdivided into cells of five orders of magnitude, and those into cells of 2.5 orders of magnitude. Moreover, as will be shown, cells of fifteen orders of magnitude also make physically real sense. All this suggests a complex combination of different classes with each other. It can hardly be taken as a coincidence, so the author had a PROPOSITION that the , constructed at the first stage simply ***as an image of stability of objects***, is also a ***convenient classification matrix for large-scale division of the Universe floors***. Let us show to what extent this assumption corresponds to the facts.
+The logical development of this scheme led the author to the construction of the S-WAVE of stability . Then it unexpectedly turned out that the SWS MODEL has additional heuristic possibilities. For example, in many cases the ***permissible range of object sizes coincides with the points of intersection of SWS and S-axis, and the scaling length of this range in many cases is equal to five  orders of magnitude***. That is, not only the main objects of thirteen classes of the Universe are located at a distance of five orders of magnitude from each other, but the scaling range of eleven of them is also almost always equal to five orders of magnitude. At the same time, each upper half-wave of the SWS, having a scaling length of five  orders, as we have already said, is "populated" mainly by ***structural*** objects, and each lower half-wave \- by ***nuclear*** objects. Moreover, it turned out that the upper and lower inflection points of the SWS are also classification boundaries, but within each of the thirteen classes. Since the special points on the SWS (inflection points and points of intersection with the S-axis) alternate in 2.5 orders, ***this model gives us a hierarchical scale classification***. In this classification, there are large cells whose scaling length is twenty orders of magnitude. These large cells are subdivided into cells of ten orders of magnitude, which in turn are subdivided into cells of five orders of magnitude, and those into cells of 2.5 orders of magnitude. Moreover, as will be shown, cells of fifteen orders of magnitude also make physically real sense. All this suggests a complex combination of different classes with each other. It can hardly be taken as a coincidence, so the author had a PROPOSITION that the , constructed at the first stage simply ***as an image of stability of objects***, is also a ***convenient classification matrix for large-scale division of the Universe floors***. Let us show to what extent this assumption corresponds to the facts.
 
 We start the analysis with the largest classification division of SW into three identical sections of about twenty  orders of magnitude each.