movefasta/sukhonos-new-dimension-book
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

27 done

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Игорь Брылёв 2025-05-10 13:41:21 +03:00
parent d666589d2a
commit a15fe5a87c
1 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
src/27_the_s_harmony_of_the_universe.md
View file

@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
# The S-harmony of the universe
CHAPTER 2.4
All the years that were devoted to the study of the regularity of the scale symmetry of the Universe, the author did not give rest to the question: ***what force is responsible for such a unique phenomenon***? After all, it is clear that none of the types of interaction known to science, can not be responsible for this order in the Universe. By giving this ***force the*** name ***S-Force***, and the ***interaction the*** name ***S-Interaction***, I only indicated to myself the necessity of searching for a new fundamental process.
## THE S-HARMONY OF THE UNIVERSE
At the same time, the ***question of the mechanism of formation of two S - Wave of stability along the S-axis*** remained unclear. Gradually, almost at the intuitive level of realization, I came to the conclusion that these two waves have completely different mechanisms of formation.
All the years that were devoted to the study of the regularity of the scale symmetry of the Universe, the author did not give rest to the question: ***what force is responsible for such a unique phenomenon***? After all, it is clear that none of the types of interaction known to science, can not be responsible for this order in the Universe. By giving this ***force the*** name ***S \-Force***, and the ***interaction the*** name ***S-Interaction***, I only indicated to myself the necessity of searching for a new fundamental process.
At the same time, the ***question of the mechanism of formation of two S \- Wave of stability along the S-axis*** remained unclear. Gradually, almost at the intuitive level of realization, I came to the conclusion that these two waves have completely different mechanisms of formation.
It was shown above that there are two forces constantly acting in the Universe, which leads to the appearance of scale symmetry. One of them is conservative, ***basic***, generating the dimensionless coefficient105. The other is the ***evolutionary*** force, which is related to the scale boundaries of the Metagalaxy and generates the dimensionless coefficient, the value of which changes continuously during the expansion of the Metagalaxy.
It was shown above that there are two forces constantly acting in the Universe, which leads to the appearance of scale symmetry. One of them is conservative, ***basic***, generating the dimensionless coefficient \\(10^5\\). The other is the ***evolutionary*** force, which is related to the scale boundaries of the Metagalaxy and generates the dimensionless coefficient, the value of which changes continuously during the expansion of the Metagalaxy.
Figuratively speaking, the ***first tendency*** operates from the depths of matter, it tunes all hierarchical floors of the Universe to the ***scale factor*** **105** like a tuning for a tuning ***chamber,*** and it can in no way be related to the dimensional parameters of objects, because *its invariability is manifested as a systemic regularity* for all objects, all hierarchical levels, at all times of life of the Universe. Another thing is the ***second tendency***. It is manifested ***through the integer division of the Universe floors*** depending on its changing scale length. The closeness of the S \- Evolutionary Coefficient of Symmetry (SECS) to the S \- Basic Coefficient of Symmetry (SBCS) should not mislead us. We are talking about two different universal phenomena.
Figuratively speaking, the ***first tendency*** operates from the depths of matter, it tunes all hierarchical floors of the Universe to the ***scale factor*** \\(10^5\\) like a tuning for a tuning ***chamber,*** and it can in no way be related to the dimensional parameters of objects, because *its invariability is manifested as a systemic regularity* for all objects, all hierarchical levels, at all times of life of the Universe. Another thing is the ***second tendency***. It is manifested ***through the integer division of the Universe floors*** depending on its changing scale length. The closeness of the S - Evolutionary Coefficient of Symmetry (SECS) to the S - Basic Coefficient of Symmetry (SBCS) should not mislead us. We are talking about two different universal phenomena.
Strange as it may seem, the author first of all succeeded in finding a theoretical approach 232 to the changing, evolutionary force. At the same time, the author is well aware that all subsequent theoretical considerations given in this chapter are ***nothing more than an attempt to find ways to the future theoretical substantiation of the phenomenon of the scale symmetry of the Universe***.
Strange as it may seem, the author first of all succeeded in finding a theoretical approach[^ref-232] to the changing, evolutionary force. At the same time, the author is well aware that all subsequent theoretical considerations given in this chapter are ***nothing more than an attempt to find ways to the future theoretical substantiation of the phenomenon of the scale symmetry of the Universe***.
[^ref-232]: Sukhonos S. I. On the Causes of the Emergence of Preferred Sizes of Natural Bodies in Nature. Dep. VINITI from 27.01.1988. № 733–V88.